StudyType	PubMedID	Author	Title	Journal	PublishDate	Chromosome	Disease	Technology	Species	CaseID	Platform	CNA	Connection	Gene	Affiliation	Abstract	GenomeAssembly	GEO	dbGaP	ENA	IsCancer	FusionGene
Research	25497101	van Heesch S, Simonis M, van Roosmalen MJ, Pillalamarri V, Brand H, Kuijk EW, de Luca KL, Lansu N, Braat AK, Menelaou A, Hao W, Korving J, Snijder S, van der Veken LT, Hochstenbach R, Knegt AC, Duran K, Renkens I, Alekozai N, Jager M, Vergult S, Menten B, de Bruijn E, Boymans S, Ippel E, van Binsbergen E, Talkowski ME, Lichtenbelt K, Cuppen E, Kloosterman WP	Genomic and functional overlap between somatic and germline chromosomal rearrangements	Cell Reports	2014 Dec 	1,3,7,12	Congenital abnormality	Next Generation Sequencing	Homo sapiens	patient 1	SOLiD V4			DPYD;FOXP1;ETV1;SNX13;TMEM106B;AHR;ARL4A;	Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, the Netherlands	Genomic rearrangements are a common cause of human congenital abnormalities. However, their origin and consequences are poorly understood. We performed molecular analysis of two patients with congenital disease who carried de novo genomic rearrangements. We found that the rearrangements in both patients hit genes that are recurrently rearranged in cancer (ETV1, FOXP1, and microRNA cluster C19MC) and drive formation of fusion genes similar to those described in cancer. Subsequent analysis of a large set of 552 de novo germline genomic rearrangements underlying congenital disorders revealed enrichment for genes rearranged in cancer and overlap with somatic cancer breakpoints. Breakpoints of common (inherited) germline structural variations also overlap with cancer breakpoints but are depleted for cancer genes. We propose that the same genomic positions are prone to genomic rearrangements in germline and soma but that timing and context of breakage determines whether developmental defects or cancer are promoted. 	GRCh37/hg19			PRJEB5063;PRJEB3030	No	DPYD,ETV1